A few months ago, I had what was, by all accounts, a normal
night. But there was, in fact, something very different about that night. A
melody came into my head that night as I was going to sleep and returned as I
was waking up. Disoriented as I might have been, right about to fall asleep or
just having woken up, I was still able to clearly tell that that melody was a
perfect candidate for a setting of the Sanctus, one of the parts of the Mass
which can be sung, and which thus is one of the components of what a musician
calls “a Mass.” In my case, that means writing a Kyrie, Gloria, Alleluia,
Credo, Sanctus, Amen, and Agnus Dei. Each of these parts is fixed from day to
day, week to week, and, if one were to use my setting or any other setting in
the original Latin/Greek/Hebrew, it would be possible for this to happen
anywhere in the world, and a Catholic attending a Mass anywhere would still understand it: no translation
required.
Music has always been a part of my life, and since middle
school, I have been trying (with varying degrees of success) not just to play
well what has already been written but even to go beyond that and write
original work well. It turns out that, after scribbling something in a weird
notation system I came up with years ago on a notepad in my bedroom and then
bringing said notepad down to my computer the following morning several months
ago, I had a pretty good starting point for the Sanctus: the song of praise to
God of all the angels into which all Catholics join our voices before the
Eucharistic Prayer.
It did not take long at all to write the Sanctus—certainly
not as long as I thought it would take—and, judging by the standards of a few
months ago, it was the best thing I had ever written given the time it took to
write it: a week or so, maybe 10 days max. I then recorded my notation software
playing it back to me, and I posted that screen recording to Twitter. Some
friends there quickly but kindly drew my attention to what were, in retrospect,
glaringly obvious errors. But most of the feedback from other people, even
people who were very technically minded like I am, was positive, so I kept the
Tweet with the recording up. I did not release another Tweet showing that I had
done this, but behind the scenes, I did consider what my followers had pointed
out, and I fixed some of those mistakes.
And that’s where things stood for a few weeks. A Sanctus on
my computer with nothing else to go with it. It was pretty obvious to me at the
time that I was going through what I had gone through many times in the past: a
period where I just did not have any ideas—at least, none good enough that I
kept thinking about them long enough to write them down. But that changed a few
weeks ago, and I very quickly came up with another idea, for a Kyrie. The Kyrie
is short (“Kyrie, eleison” twice, then “Christe, eleison” twice, and then
“Kyrie eleison” twice more), so that took only an afternoon to write much less
time than the Sanctus, for two reasons. First, as I already mentioned, the
Kyrie is much shorter, and writing less music, in general, takes less time than
writing more music. But perhaps more importantly, the creative process had
already started with the Sanctus, so I knew what I liked and what I hated, what
worked and what did not work. And because I did not have to repeat that process
of discovery again, the Kyrie was all done in maybe an hour.
Ideas came quickly for the Gloria and the Credo, and soon
after that, the Amen and the Alleluia. At this point, I was not really working
on just one movement and trying my hardest to get it done before moving on to
the next one. I would write a few measures of new melody or fill in a few
measures of harmony each day, wherever I had new ideas. Day-to-day, I did not
have goals measuring how much I wanted to write, or which movements I wanted to
get done by certain deadlines. I just let the creative process happen
organically; some days were incredibly productive, and others, not so much.
As I continued working on the Gloria and the Credo—by far the longest texts, so also the longest compositions—I came into a rhythm, a style I found to be uniquely mine. Interestingly, setting a comprehensive list of what we believe to music revealed in myself a sense of compositional identity I hadn't felt before, that blossomed through this project. And as I discovered the existence of and familiarized myself with my own style, I became comfortable in it, and so too in the creative process that that style was generating. Writing a summary of everything we believe and then writing out the song of praise of the shepherds was supposed to be a daunting task, but because of this comfort, it was not, or if it was, it was much less than I expected it would be. Good creative work is a positively reinforcing feedback loop: you do good work, so you want to do more, after which your work gets better, so you produce even more, and so on. The existence of such a loop became evident quite quickly, and I relished in it. Ideas came to me at all hours of the day, and, as soon as I could, I would jot them down in my software. I did not know at the time if those ideas would make it to the final draft of the Mass I was writing, but, honestly, I did not care. I just wrote because I liked writing, and I did not want any of the ideas I had to slip away into the void never to be picked up again.
After several weeks of writing, and especially after going
through hot streaks and dry spells within the project, I realized very late, in
fact—on the first day I was thinking about getting a group of people together
to sing the parts live—that one of the movements that was essential was
missing. Somehow, perhaps because of just how organically I had let the
creative process develop, I had not yet written an Agnus Dei, which accompanies
the Rite of Fraction of the Host and the commingling of a tiny piece from that
Host into the Chalice, after both have been consecrated. Just thinking about
that absence was enough. Not even five minutes later, I had found a theme I
liked, and, half an hour later—the fastest-written movement yet—the Agnus Dei
was done.
Throughout that journey of discovery of a personal style, I
found that that style included dropping a number of “Easter eggs” as we say in
the computing world: hidden stuff that is technically from somewhere else that
in context feels like it should be exactly where it is. I will briefly give a
few examples. I wrote the section in the Credo referring to Christ’s
resurrection and ascension right after Easter, so the hymn melody Llanfair was
in my mind at the time (because either “Llanfair” or “Lyra Davidica” is most
often used to set Wesley’s text of “Jesus Christ is Risen Today” to music, and
“Llanfair” is easier to sing, so I chose it over “Lyra”). Immediately thereafter,
I thought the most logical way to refer to the Ascension after quoting “Lyra”
for the Resurrection was to turn the melodic line into an ascending scale. When
the Credo refers to the fact that the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the
Son, for no reason than that I come up
with an original melody good enough and that I realized this quotation would
work, I lifted the “Ode to Joy” to use in context. Several movements in the
Mass quote each other; the first phrases of the Kyrie and the Gloria are deliberately
identical.
That idea to connect movements by either making them wholly
or partially identical was not mine but rather, in the context of liturgical
music, came from one of my heroes: Johann Sebastian Bach. Bach was not a
Catholic, but rather a Lutheran, and yet he wrote the greatest “Missa Tota”
setting ever. I, like many composers before me, wrote a “Missa Brevis:” All the
parts of the Mass are there, but each part is its own movement. There is one
Kyrie, one Gloria, and so on. If I had written a Missa Tota as Bach did in his
masterwork Mass in B minor, I am sure I would still be working until well after
my 30th birthday—and I just turned 20 this year. This dramatic increase in length is due to the fact that Missas Totas contain
all the parts, as does mine, but instead of giving each prayer a single
movement, each word or phrase gets a single movement. (I will provide the
translation instead of the original Latin or Greek so that this point will be
more easily understood.) So in the longer form of writing a Mass, “Lord, have mercy” is two movements in the Kyrie,
separate from “Christ, have mercy,” which is its own. “Glory to God in the highest” is separate
from “and peace to people of God will,” which, again, is separate from “We
praise you,” “We bless you,” “We adore you,” and “We glorify you.” Just in this
short list of examples, I have already mentioned the existence of at least 9
movements in only the Kyrie and the beginning of the Gloria. Going through the
entire Mass in this manner would yield dozens of movements and hours of music, but writing as I did yielded a complete Mass in only 7 movements and 12 or so minutes of music.
Writing a Mass—and even having the potential that this project might be known to the world—certainly has been an interesting process. Now that the writing phase is done, the project has now moved into the “let the world know this thing exists” phase. The first step in this process, undertaken over the last 24 hours was contacting a few musician friends and Catholic Centers at universities near me, and a choir of recent graduates to ask if they would work with me. The current step is this blog post and just a general “wait-and-see-what-happens” attitude. Hopefully, after this phase will come another one in which some subset of the people and groups I contacted will like my work enough that, assuming it’s safe to do so, we can get together and actually sing and play through the Mass, either in a concert outside the celebration of the Mass but nevertheless at the parish, or, in a perfect world, singing and playing through this within the celebration of the liturgy, and even possibly recording such a performance. I have no idea if or when any of this will happen, but if anything does come of my attempts to perform/record this, I’ll be sure to update this post with where to find them.
No comments:
Post a Comment